SCHH vs RWR: Which REIT ETF Fits Your Portfolio
Axe Capital view
SCHH vs RWR: Picking the Right U.S. REIT ETF from South Africa
Deciding between SCHH’s low cost and RWR’s income focus depends on your priorities amid a volatile rand.
When considering U.S. real estate investment via ETFs from South Africa, the saucer-size difference in expense ratios between SCHH (0.07%) and RWR (closer to 0.25%) is hard to ignore. SCHH’s broad diversification with over 120 holdings reduces stock-specific risk, appealing if you lean towards a steady, low-cost core holding. RWR, on the other hand, has outperformed recently with a 22% return and pays a higher dividend yield of about 3.2%. That income might look attractive when the rand is volatile — especially as USD/ZAR stays elevated near 19-20, boosting dollar returns in local terms. But higher fees and concentrated holdings mean you pay a premium for that yield. For SA investors, the rand’s swings could sway your real returns. If you expect ZAR weakness will persist, RWR’s income focus could pay off. Yet should the rand bounce back, SCHH’s lower costs help protect against underperformance. I'm leaning towards SCHH for most portfolios but keep an eye on the rand’s direction; a rapid currency recovery could tilt the scales to RWR. this is just my opinion and not financial advice
Buy SCHH for diversified, cost-efficient exposure to U.S. REITs with a local edge on expenses. Consider RWR only if you want higher income and are confident the rand will stay weak or depreciate further.
- SCHH
- RWR
- USD/ZAR
- Sudden rand appreciation reducing foreign income gains
- U.S. interest rate hikes dragging down REIT valuations
6/10
The Schwab U.S. REIT ETF (SCHH) offers a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.07% and broader diversification with 121 holdings, making it ideal for cost-conscious investors. The State Street SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) has delivered superior recent performance with a 22.20% one-year return and higher 3.20% dividend yield, appealing to income-focused investors. Both funds provide 100% exposure to U.S. REITs with similar top holdings.
This article was originally published by The Motley Fool and has been adapted here for Axe Capital Trading News.
Publisher: The Motley Fool
Author: Jake Lerch
Categories: Rates, Equities, Capital Returns
Tickers: SCHH, RWR, WELL, PLD, SPG, SPGPJ
Sentiment: Positive - Highlighted for ultra-low 0.07% expense ratio, broader diversification with 121 holdings, and suitability for cost-conscious investors seeking long-term value through lower fees. Praised for superior one-year performance of 22.20%, higher trailing dividend yield of 3.20%, and stronger historical returns, making it attractive for income-focused investors.
Keywords: REIT ETF comparison, expense ratio, dividend yield, real estate investment, fund performance, diversification
Insights:
- SCHH: Positive: Highlighted for ultra-low 0.07% expense ratio, broader diversification with 121 holdings, and suitability for cost-conscious investors seeking long-term value through lower fees.
- RWR: Positive: Praised for superior one-year performance of 22.20%, higher trailing dividend yield of 3.20%, and stronger historical returns, making it attractive for income-focused investors.
- WELL: Neutral: Mentioned as a top holding in both ETFs (11.14% in RWR, 11.08% in SCHH) but no specific company performance analysis provided.
Related coverage
- Figma vs. IBM: What Revenue Growth Trends Tell Investors About the Young Software Design Company and the Veteran Artificial Intelligence Tech Giant
- Elon Musk Is Quietly Turning to This Fossil Fuel to Power His AI Ambitions.
- Nebius vs. Strategy: Comparing Revenue Trends Between an Artificial Intelligence Company and a Bitcoin Giant