VIG vs. SCHD: The Better Dividend ETF Might Be the One With the Lower Yield
2026-10-03 15:30
•David Dierking •The Motley Fool
•••••• •••• Axe Cap view
Dividend ETFs: Yield Isn't Everything
Choosing between VIG and SCHD depends on whether you want growth or income, not just who pays the bigger dividend.
VIG and SCHD offer different takes on dividend investing. VIG leans into tech giants like Microsoft and Apple, chasing dividend growth and capital appreciation. Its yield is modest at 1.4%, but it has handed investors slightly better returns over the last decade. On the other hand, SCHD offers a higher yield of 3.3%, focusing on defensive sectors like healthcare and consumer staples. It’s a safer haven for those prioritising income and lower volatility. South African investors need to consider how these profiles fit with local assets, especially for those already exposed to rand-sensitive stocks like Naspers or financials such as Standard Bank. If the rand weakens against the dollar, the US tech-heavy VIG’s currency drag could hurt returns more than SCHD’s stable sectors. I'd lean toward SCHD for income seekers looking to hedge rand volatility, while growth-oriented investors can cautiously add VIG. The risk? A sharp tech rally or a dollar crash could flip the script, favoring VIG. this is just our opinion and not financial advice
For income with some safety, favour SCHD. For growth with tech exposure and longer horizons, add VIG selectively. Keep an eye on the USD/ZAR trend as a risk factor.
- VIG
- SCHD
- USD/ZAR
- Usd/Zar volatility impacting returns
- Tech sector corrections affecting VIG
6/10
The article compares two dividend ETFs: Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). While VIG has slightly better 10-year returns (13% vs 12.7%), the choice between them depends on investor objectives. VIG offers a growth-oriented profile with lower yield (1.4%) and tech exposure, suitable for risk-tolerant investors. SCHD provides higher yield (3.3%) with defensive positioning in healthcare and consumer staples, better for income-focused investors. Neither is objectively better; selection should be based on portfolio composition and personal goals rather than yield alone.
Our take is based on reporting first published by The Motley Fool.
More stories like this
- Caterpillar Trades Above $800. Here's Why It Could Be a $1,000 Stock by 2028.
- ASML vs. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company: What Revenue Trends Tell Investors About These Companies Tied to Artificial Intelligence
- This Nearly 16%-Yielding Dividend Stock Has Paid Out $16 Billion Since 2008. Here's Why I'm Not Worried About the Next Payment.